Tabbing Converse is very likely a waste of time - as I've just found out. It took me an hour to do one short piece, Modoc Reel, and trying to put in all the info Converse supplies is quite a challenge. I've noticed Marc Smith's and Tim Twiss's attempts and comments, and have to agree with them that it is a difficult job.
Here's my tab-only version of The Modoc Reel: Modoc Banjo.pdf
Converse uses three versions of the number 1 to indicate the striking finger:
A 1 on its own begins a 'Combination' stroke where the stroke is played in combination with the thumb resting in preparation on another string
A 1 with a dot under it indicates a 'Hammer' stroke - a firm downward stroke without the thumb falling simultaneously onto another string. The Thumb supports the index finger by resting on it.
A 1 with a line through it - this appears quite often but I can't find an explanation of it. Does anyone know?
I've indicated the first two with a C for Combination and an H for Hammer. I have made things less cluttered by not indicating that it is the thumb which strikes the fifth string.
The question is - how much of this is needed? How much of it would be obvious? How much of it needs to be indicated? Does the notation differ from modern clawhammer technique enough to warrant the time to notate every right-hand fingering? Could Converse have simplified things by just saying that any finger strike that is not followed by a thumb stroke should be a hammer stroke?
I know the ideal would be a facsimile on one page and the tab on the facing page, but let's face it, most people would not keep darting back between the two. I can see the point of having the tab beneath the standard notation, but even there, how much info do we duplicate in each stave, as most folk are not likely to look at both?
Tags:
I thought it was a familar piece. BTW, what does Modoc mean or refer to? Is it a place?
© 2025 Created by John Masciale. Powered by